In what way does Collins’s poem contrast with Tyson’s essay regarding the portrayal of humanity?

The choice emphasizing human vulnerability amidst cosmic forces aligns with the themes presented in Tyson’s essay, which often explores humanity's place in the universe, acknowledging the overwhelming scale and power of cosmic forces in relation to human life. Tyson’s work tends to illustrate how small and fragile human existence is when juxtaposed with the vastness of space and the forces that govern it, which reinforces a view of humanity as part of an unpredictable and sometimes hostile universe.

In contrast, Collins’s poem may take a different perspective by highlighting human experiences, emotions, and resilience, potentially allowing for a narrative that contrasts with a purely vulnerability-based view. This contrast underscores the different ways in which these authors approach the concept of humanity in relation to the larger universe—one from a perspective of fragility and vulnerability, while the other may emphasize emotional depth and the richness of human experience.

The other choices present themes that do not accurately reflect the nuances in the texts. For instance, promoting human triumph over nature doesn’t align with Tyson’s perspective, which often emphasizes an acknowledgment of our limitations rather than claiming supremacy over nature. Similarly, while both might touch on creativity, it is not the central theme in Tyson's essay, since his focus is more on the existential and cosmic themes rather than artistic